Leading Projects That Actually Ship: The Art of Execution

Last week’s issue: Mastering Year-End

Join 7500+ leaders

Looking to start a newsletter? Use Beehiiv (it’s what we use)

AI promises speed and efficiency, but it’s leaving many leaders feeling more overwhelmed than ever.

The real problem isn’t technology.

It’s the pressure to do more with less — without losing what makes your leadership effective.

BELAY created the free resource 5 Traits AI Can’t Replace & Why They Matter More Than Ever to help leaders pinpoint where AI can help and where human judgment is still essential.

At BELAY, we help leaders accomplish more by matching them with top-tier, U.S.-based Executive Assistants who bring the discernment, foresight, and relational intelligence that AI can’t replicate.

That way, you can focus on vision. Not systems.

Download the 5 Traits AI Can’t Replace.

Hello team,

Years ago, I led a project that should have been straightforward. We had executive buy-in, a clear timeline, talented people, and adequate resources. Six months later, we were three months behind schedule, scope had crept by 40%, and two key team members had asked to be reassigned.

What went wrong? The strategy was fine. The plan was solid. But I'd failed at the daily work of project leadership, managing stakeholders, maintaining clarity, protecting the team, and adapting when reality didn't match the plan.

This week, let's talk about how to lead projects that actually ship, not just start with enthusiasm but finish with results.

Here's what I've learned about projects: everyone gets excited at kickoff. The vision is clear, the energy is high, and success feels inevitable. Then reality hits.

Requirements that seemed simple turn out to be complex. Dependencies you didn't see emerge. The timeline that felt reasonable starts feeling impossible. Stakeholders who nodded along at kickoff now have opinions and concerns. Your team is stressed, progress has slowed, and you're starting to wonder if this thing will ever ship.

This is the messy middle, where most projects fail. Not because the idea was bad, but because leaders don't know how to navigate the chaos between vision and delivery.

Why projects derail:

Ambiguity is tolerated too long. At kickoff, everyone nods along to high-level goals. But when people start building, they discover they have different interpretations of success. By the time this surfaces, you've lost weeks going in wrong directions.

Scope creeps invisibly. Someone suggests a small addition. Then another. Then another. Each one feels reasonable in isolation. Six weeks later, you're building something 30% bigger than you planned, but the timeline hasn't changed.

Risks aren't surfaced early. Teams know when things are going sideways, but they don't always raise it. They hope they can fix it, or they're afraid of looking incompetent. By the time you hear about it, the problem is much bigger.

Stakeholder alignment erodes. You had agreement at kickoff, but people's priorities shift, new concerns emerge, and suddenly the sponsor who was enthusiastic is now questioning the approach. Without active management, support evaporates.

Project leadership isn't one thing, it shifts based on where you are. I learned this the hard way on that failed project. I led the same way throughout, but each phase needed something different.

Phase 1: Launch (Weeks 1-2)

Your job is clarity and alignment. You're answering: What are we building? Why does it matter? Who's doing what? How will we know we're successful?

This is where you establish the foundation. Take the time to get agreement on scope, success criteria, roles, and decision-making authority. Document it. Share it broadly. Make ambiguity visible and resolve it.

Don't rush through this phase. I've seen leaders so eager to get to "real work" that they skip the hard conversations about scope and trade-offs. You'll pay for that shortcut later.

Phase 2: Execution (The Messy Middle)

Your job shifts to protection and adaptation. You're shielding the team from distractions, making decisions quickly, clearing blockers, and adjusting the plan as you learn.

This is the grind. Progress feels slow. Problems emerge daily. Stakeholders get nervous. Your team gets tired. This is where your discipline matters most, maintaining the cadence of check-ins, keeping stakeholders informed, celebrating small wins, and course-correcting before small issues become big ones.

Phase 3: Delivery (Final Weeks)

Your job becomes quality assurance and transition. You're ensuring what you're shipping actually works, that it solves the problem it was meant to solve, and that there's a plan for ongoing support or iteration.

Don't declare victory too early. I've watched teams sprint to hit a deadline, only to ship something that immediately breaks or doesn't meet user needs. The last 10% matters more than you think.

“When I first opened Attio, I instantly got the feeling this was the next generation of CRM.”
— Margaret Shen, Head of GTM at Modal

Attio is the AI-native CRM for modern teams. With automatic enrichment, call intelligence, AI agents, flexible workflows and more, Attio works for any business and only takes minutes to set up.

Join industry leaders like Granola, Taskrabbit, Flatfile and more.

👉 Start for free today

1. Maintaining forcing functions. Without structure, projects drift. Establish rhythms that create momentum: weekly status meetings where decisions get made, sprint reviews where progress is visible, milestone gates where you assess quality before moving forward.

These aren't bureaucracy, they're how you maintain focus and accountability. The teams I've seen succeed all had tight cadences and clear checkpoints.

2. Making trade-offs visible and decisive. Projects involve constant trade-offs: speed vs. quality, features vs. simplicity, team capacity vs. deadlines. Weak project leaders let these decisions stay implicit or get made by default.

Strong project leaders force the conversation: "We can have X or Y, but not both given our constraints. Here's my recommendation and why. What are we choosing?" Make the trade-off explicit, get alignment, document it, and move forward.

3. Creating feedback loops early. Don't wait until the end to validate you're building the right thing. Get partial solutions in front of users or stakeholders quickly. A rough prototype in week two is worth more than perfect designs in week ten that turn out to be wrong.

I learned this on a project years back where we built exactly what was specified, shipped on time, and discovered users hated it. We'd never shown them anything until it was done. Expensive mistake.

4. Managing stakeholder anxiety. As the project progresses, stakeholders get nervous. They ask for updates, question decisions, or suggest changes. This is normal. Your job is to keep them informed without letting their anxiety destabilize the team.

Regular, structured communication works better than reactive responses. A weekly written update that shows progress, names risks, and requests specific input keeps stakeholders engaged without them hovering over the team.

5. Protecting your team's focus. Your team can't execute if they're constantly interrupted by new requests, shifting priorities, or stakeholder drive-bys. Part of your job is being a shield—saying no to distractions, pushing back on scope changes, and creating space for deep work.

This doesn't mean being rigid, but it means being intentional. When something new comes up, you evaluate it against existing commitments and make an explicit choice about priority.

The best project leaders I've worked with have a sixth sense for trouble. They spot problems weeks before they become crises. Here's what they watch for:

Velocity changes. If the team was moving quickly and suddenly slows down, something's wrong. Don't wait for someone to tell you—ask directly what's causing the slowdown.

Communication patterns shift. If people who were engaged go quiet, if meetings get tense, if you're not hearing bad news—these are signals. Healthy projects have healthy conflict and transparent communication.

Scope conversations increase. If stakeholders are frequently asking about adding things or changing direction, your original alignment is breaking down. Stop and realign before you lose weeks of work.

Team energy drops. Tired teams make mistakes. Frustrated teams lose quality. If morale is tanking, you need to address it—adjust timeline, reduce scope, add support, or acknowledge the difficulty and remind people why it matters.

Don't wait for the formal status update to reveal problems. Stay close enough to the work that you can sense when something's off.

Project leadership isn't about perfect plans—it's about disciplined execution through uncertainty. It's about maintaining clarity when things get messy, making decisions when information is incomplete, and keeping people moving forward when progress feels slow.

The projects that succeed aren't the ones with the best kickoff decks. They're the ones where leaders did the daily work of communicating, deciding, protecting, and adapting all the way through to delivery.

That's the craft. And it's worth mastering.

Until next week, Your Leadership Partner

In the premium section below, I share the frameworks and templates I use to lead projects from kickoff to successful delivery:

These aren't theoretical, they're the battle-tested tools I use on every significant project.