Mastering Year-End Performance Conversations: Make Them Matter

Last week’s issue: The Art of Managing Up

Join 7500+ leaders

Looking to start a newsletter? Use Beehiiv (it’s what we use)

AI promises speed and efficiency, but it’s leaving many leaders feeling more overwhelmed than ever.

The real problem isn’t technology.

It’s the pressure to do more with less — without losing what makes your leadership effective.

BELAY created the free resource 5 Traits AI Can’t Replace & Why They Matter More Than Ever to help leaders pinpoint where AI can help and where human judgment is still essential.

At BELAY, we help leaders accomplish more by matching them with top-tier, U.S.-based Executive Assistants who bring the discernment, foresight, and relational intelligence that AI can’t replicate.

That way, you can focus on vision. Not systems.

Download the 5 Traits AI Can’t Replace.

Hello team,

It's that time of year again. Performance review season. For many leaders, this means weeks of stress, awkward conversations, and a nagging sense that despite all the effort, nothing will really change.

I remember early in my leadership career, I spent hours crafting the perfect performance review for a talented but struggling team member. I documented everything, chose my words carefully, and rehearsed my delivery. The conversation went fine—or so I thought. Three months later, nothing had changed. When I checked in, he admitted he didn't really understand what I needed him to do differently.

I'd done the review. But I hadn't done the leadership work.

This week, let's talk about how to make year-end performance conversations actually matter—for your people and for your organization.

Here's the uncomfortable truth: most performance reviews are theater. We go through the motions because HR requires it, we fill out forms, we have the conversation, we get signatures. Then we file it away and move on.

But nothing changes. The high performer who needed stretch opportunities still isn't getting them. The struggling team member still doesn't know what good looks like. The person with potential still hasn't gotten the coaching they need to level up.

Why do reviews fail?

We conflate assessment with development. In a single conversation, we're trying to judge someone's past performance (assessment) and help them grow (development). These require different mindsets, and mixing them often means both suffer.

We focus on the form, not the person. The review becomes about populating fields in the system rather than understanding the human in front of us. We're thinking about ratings and justifications instead of growth and capability.

We treat it as an event, not a process. One conversation per year can't undo 364 days of insufficient feedback, unclear expectations, or misalignment. If the review contains surprises, you've already failed.

We avoid the hard truths. When we need to deliver difficult feedback, we soften it so much that people miss the message. They leave thinking they're doing fine when they're actually in danger.

Years ago, a mentor taught me to split the year-end review into two separate conversations, usually a week apart. It changed everything.

Conversation One: The Assessment (Past Focus) This is where you deliver the evaluation, discuss the rating, talk about compensation if relevant. You're looking backward. The goal is clarity: "Here's how you performed against expectations. Here's how you compared to peers. Here's what you did well and where you fell short."

Keep this factual and evidence-based. No surprises if you've been giving feedback throughout the year. Answer their questions. Let them process. Don't rush to problem-solving.

Conversation Two: The Development (Future Focus) This happens after they've had time to absorb the assessment. Now you're looking forward: "Given where you are, where do you want to go? What capabilities do you need to build? How can I support your growth?"

This is collaborative. You're partnering on their development, not just telling them what to fix. The energy is different—constructive rather than evaluative.

Separating these conversations eliminates the whiplash of "you didn't meet expectations, now let's talk about your exciting future here." It honors the fact that people need time to process evaluation before they can engage in forward-looking development planning.

AI has changed how consumers shop, but people still drive decisions. Levanta’s research shows affiliate and creator content continues to influence conversions, plus it now shapes the product recommendations AI delivers. Affiliate marketing isn’t being replaced by AI, it’s being amplified.

Download the full report

1. No surprises, ever. If someone learns something new about their performance in the year-end review, you've failed as a leader. These conversations should be confirmatory, not revelatory. Everything in the review should have been discussed in real-time throughout the year.

The review is documentation and synthesis, not disclosure. If you need to deliver a surprise, have that conversation immediately—don't wait for review season.

2. Be specific and evidence-based. Vague feedback is useless feedback. "You need to be more strategic" tells someone nothing. "In the Q3 planning meeting, you focused on tactical execution details rather than discussing how our work ladders up to company priorities" gives them something concrete.

Build your reviews on specific examples. What did they do? What was the impact? What could have been different? Give people the raw material to understand and change.

3. Balance honesty with humanity. Being direct doesn't mean being cruel. You can tell someone hard truths while treating them with dignity. The goal is clarity, not comfort, but you can be clear and kind simultaneously.

I learned this during a particularly difficult review years back. The person wasn't going to be promoted, and I needed to explain why. I was direct about the gaps, but I also acknowledged their strengths and my commitment to their growth. The conversation was hard, but they thanked me afterward for my honesty. Six months later, they'd addressed the gaps.

4. Own your contribution. Performance issues are rarely just about the individual. Where did you fail to provide clarity? Where were resources insufficient? Where did organizational dysfunction make their job harder?

Acknowledging your role doesn't excuse poor performance, but it builds trust and shared accountability. "I should have been clearer about expectations in Q2" or "I didn't give you the support you needed during that transition" shows you see the full picture.

Here's the structure I use for delivering performance feedback:

Start with the headline. Don't bury the lead. If someone exceeded expectations, say it immediately. If they didn't meet the bar, say that clearly. Humans can't process details until they know the high-level message.

Walk through strengths first. What did they do well? Be specific. This isn't the compliment sandwich—you're genuinely highlighting valuable contributions. People need to know what to keep doing.

Address development areas. What needs to improve? Again, be specific. Connect it to impact. "When you miss deadlines without flagging them early, the team can't adjust and projects get derailed."

Invite their perspective. "What's your take on this? Do you see it differently?" Listen. Sometimes you're missing context. Sometimes they need to voice frustration before they can hear feedback. Create space for dialogue.

Discuss the path forward. What needs to change? What support do they need? What will you do differently as their leader? Make the development tangible and collaborative.

End with affirmation. Remind them why they matter to the team and that you're invested in their success. Even in difficult conversations, people need to know you believe in their potential.

Performance reviews aren't just HR compliance. They're leadership moments. They're opportunities to help people see themselves clearly, grow their capabilities, and strengthen their commitment to the team and mission.

But only if you treat them that way. Only if you prepare thoughtfully, deliver honestly, and follow through consistently.

Your team deserves leaders who take performance conversations seriously. Not because the form demands it, but because developing people is the work.

Until next week, Your Leadership Partner

In the premium section below, I share the exact frameworks and scripts I use to make year-end conversations effective and growth-oriented:

These aren't theoretical—they're the actual tools I use every review cycle to make these conversations matter.