In partnership with

Last week’s issue: Upgrade your Mindset

Welcome back to House of Leadership

We explore what it really takes to grow and lead successfully in a fast-paced, high-performance environemnt. Every week, we provide a core idea and practical actions to apply right away. If you want the deeper insights, frameworks, and templates that accelerate your career growth and leadership impact, please go premium.

Looking to start a newsletter? Use Beehiiv (it’s what we use)

What you'll learn today:

  • The negotiation framework that stops you from leaving money on the table

  • Three strategic positioning moves that multiply earning potential faster than tenure

  • How to evaluate opportunities based on capability-building, not just compensation

  • Why your direct manager matters more than the company brand for long-term earnings

  • A practical action checklist to start architecting your next move this week

Introducing the first AI-native CRM

Connect your email, and you’ll instantly get a CRM with enriched customer insights and a platform that grows with your business.

With AI at the core, Attio lets you:

  • Prospect and route leads with research agents

  • Get real-time insights during customer calls

  • Build powerful automations for your complex workflows

Join industry leaders like Granola, Taskrabbit, Flatfile and more.

Dear Team,

Merry Christmas!

Let's talk about something most leadership newsletters avoid: money.

Not in an abstract "create value and rewards will follow" way. I mean the actual mechanics of earning more as a leader, how to negotiate better, how to position yourself strategically, and how to choose opportunities that compound your growth instead of just paying the bills.

Because here's what nobody tells you: being good at your job is not the same as being good at getting paid for your job. They're related, but they're different skill sets. And most talented leaders I know are significantly better at the former than the latter.

This isn't about being mercenary. It's about recognising that your earning potential is one of the most important levers you have for building the career and life you actually want. And like any other leadership skill, it can be learned.

The Negotiation Trap Most Leaders Fall Into

The scene: You get a job offer. You're excited. They say $140K. You were hoping for $160K but don't want to seem greedy or difficult. You counter at $150K. They meet you at $145K. You accept, grateful they came up at all.

What just happened: You left $15K on the table. Compounded over a career, that's hundreds of thousands of dollars. Maybe more.

Here's the thing about negotiation that took me years to understand: the goal isn't to get them to say yes to your number. The goal is to have a conversation about value where multiple variables are in play.

The Framework That Changed My Negotiations

Stop thinking about salary as a single number you're fighting over. Think about it as a package with multiple components you can optimise:

Base salary — This is your floor, and it matters because bonuses and raises are often percentages of base

Signing bonus — Often easier to negotiate than base because it's one-time, not recurring

Equity/Stock options — Can be worth more than salary if you choose the right company; ask about vesting schedule and strike price

Performance bonus structure — Is it discretionary or guaranteed? What are the actual payout rates?

Title — Affects your next negotiation; sometimes worth trading money now for positioning later

Professional development budget — Executive coaching, conferences, courses; negotiate this explicitly

Flexibility — Remote work, schedule autonomy, sabbatical options; these have real economic value

Start date — Delaying 2-4 weeks can give you leverage and rest between roles

What This Sounds Like in Practice

Instead of: "I was hoping for $160K"

Try: "I'm excited about this role. Based on my research and the scope of what you're asking me to take on, I was expecting the package to be in the $160-170K range for base. I'm flexible on how we get there, whether that's base, signing bonus, or accelerated equity vesting. What's possible?"

Notice what you just did? You anchored higher, showed you've done research, demonstrated flexibility, and invited them into problem-solving with you. You're not demanding. You're exploring what's possible together.

The move most people miss: After they respond, pause. Let the silence sit for three full seconds. You'd be amazed at what people offer into silence.

Strategic Positioning: The Moves That Actually Accelerate Earnings

Negotiating well matters. But choosing the right moves matters more. Here are the strategic positioning plays I've seen multiply people's earning potential:

Play #1: Choose Growth Over Brand (At Least Once)

The prestigious company with the fancy logo often pays well. But it's also stable, which means there's a ceiling on how fast you can grow.

Early-to-mid career, consider taking the less famous company that's growing fast and needs senior leadership. You'll get:

  • Broader scope faster (you'll be leading things you'd wait years to touch at BigCo)

  • Equity that might actually be worth something

  • The opportunity to be known as someone who builds, not just maintains

A friend took a VP role at a Series B startup for 30% less than she was making at a Fortune 500. Eighteen months later, she was promoted to Chief of Staff to the CEO with equity that's now worth more than she made in her entire previous job. The growth trajectory matters more than the starting point.

Shoppers are adding to cart for the holidays

Over the next year, Roku predicts that 100% of the streaming audience will see ads. For growth marketers in 2026, CTV will remain an important “safe space” as AI creates widespread disruption in the search and social channels. Plus, easier access to self-serve CTV ad buying tools and targeting options will lead to a surge in locally-targeted streaming campaigns.

Read our guide to find out why growth marketers should make sure CTV is part of their 2026 media mix.

Play #2: Master One Thing That's Economically Valuable Right Now

Being a "well-rounded leader" is fine. Being the person who can definitively solve an expensive problem is worth 2-3x more.

Right now, these skills command premium compensation:

  • Leading AI transformation in traditional industries

  • Building and scaling go-to-market in new categories

  • Turning around struggling teams or products

  • M&A integration leadership

  • Regulatory/compliance expertise in emerging tech

Pick one. Get exceptional at it. Make sure everyone knows you're exceptional at it. Then watch the opportunities (and offers) compound.

Play #3: Optimise for Hiring Manager, Not Company

This is counterintuitive, but your direct manager has more impact on your growth and earnings than the company does.

A great manager at a mediocre company will:

  • Give you stretch projects that build your resume

  • Advocate for your promotions and raises

  • Introduce you to their network

  • Create visibility for your work at senior levels

A mediocre manager at a great company will keep you stuck regardless of how strong the brand is.

How to evaluate this in interviews: Ask the hiring manager directly: "Tell me about the last person you managed who got promoted. What did you do to help make that happen?" Their answer tells you everything.

The Team Alignment Question Everyone Gets Wrong

"Should I join this team?" is the wrong question.

The right question is: "Will this team help me build the capabilities I need for where I want to be in three years?"

Most people optimize for comfort (teams where they'll fit in easily) or prestige (teams with impressive people). Both are traps if they don't build the specific capabilities you need next.

The 3-Year Capability Map

Sit down and honestly answer:

  1. Where do I want to be in three years, specifically? (Not "more senior", what actual role, what actual scope?)

  2. What capabilities do I need to build to be credible for that role?

  3. Which of those can I build in my current role versus what I need to go elsewhere to develop?

Then evaluate every opportunity against that map. The highest-paying role right now might be the wrong move if it doesn't build what you need. The lower-paying role that puts you on the critical path to where you want to be in three years? That's often the right bet.

A colleague turned down a $200K director role at a stable company to take a $160K director role at a scaling startup specifically because she needed to learn how to build a function from scratch—something the stable company would never let her do. Eighteen months later, she leveraged that experience into a VP role at $280K. The "lower-paying" job was actually the higher-value move.

The Uncomfortable Truth

Here's what I've learned watching hundreds of leaders navigate their careers: the people who earn significantly more aren't necessarily better leaders. They're better at strategically positioning themselves, negotiating confidently, and making calculated moves that compound over time.

That might feel uncomfortable. We like to believe that good work speaks for itself. Sometimes it does. Often it doesn't.

Your job is to be excellent at what you do AND excellent at making sure that excellence translates into the compensation, opportunities, and impact you deserve.

Both matter. And only you can do the second part.

This Week's Action:

Pick one thing:

  • Research your market rate on levels.fyi, Glassdoor, and by asking three people in similar roles what ranges they're seeing

  • Update your "capability map"—where do you want to be in 3 years and what do you need to build?

  • Practice your negotiation framing out loud (seriously, say it to yourself in the mirror, it feels silly but it works.

  • Reach out to one person who made a career move you admire and ask them: "What did you optimise for when you made that decision?"

You don't have to do all of it. Just one thing. This week.

Because the difference between leaders who earn what they're worth and leaders who don't often comes down to whether they treat their career as something that happens to them or something they actively architect.

Be well,

P.S. - The most common response I get when I send newsletters like this is "I wish I'd known this ten years ago." Don't let that be you ten years from now. Start now.

Reply

or to participate