Unlimited everything. No contract. Just $25/mo. With Tello, you get reliable 5G coverage, zero hidden fees, and none of the bundles you never wanted.

Build Your Own Tello Plan

Covering today

You Can't Have Both

Ask most new leaders what kind of manager they want to be, and somewhere in the answer you'll hear a version of "someone people actually like working for."

It's a good instinct. It's also a trap.

Being liked and being respected aren't the same goal wearing different clothes. They often require opposite behaviour. Respect asks you to say the hard thing. Likeability asks you to soften it. Respect asks you to hold the line. Likeability asks you to bend it, just this once, for someone who's having a rough month.

Most leaders don't choose between these consciously. They drift toward likeability because it's rewarded immediately, in the room, in real time. Respect is rewarded later, and often invisibly, by people who stay, try harder, and trust your word.

Here's the part almost nobody tells you: respect produces likeability over time. Likeability rarely produces respect.

People end up genuinely liking leaders who were fair, direct and consistent, even when those leaders made calls they didn't enjoy in the moment. What they don't end up liking, long-term, is a leader who was pleasant to everyone and trusted by no one, because pleasant without substance eventually reads as unreliable.

The leaders chasing likeability are optimising for the wrong timeframe. They want the good feeling now. Respect asks you to tolerate a worse feeling now, in exchange for something sturdier later.

You don't have to scroll every AI thread, track every new tool, or watch every demo. 

The Rundown AI breaks it all down for you — the latest AI news, tools, and tutorials in one free 5-minute email every morning. 

Trusted by 2M+ professionals at Apple, Google, and NASA.

Sign up to start learning.

Marcus led a twelve-person creative team, and he was, by every account, well liked. Easy to talk to. Quick with praise. Rarely said no.

When deadlines slipped, he absorbed it. When someone missed a commitment, he covered the gap himself rather than raise it directly. He told himself he was being supportive, protecting morale, giving people room to breathe.

Over eighteen months, something shifted. The same two or three people always missed deadlines, because they'd learned nothing happened when they did. The people who consistently delivered started quietly resenting the ones who didn't, because Marcus never closed the gap between them. Nobody said this to his face. They just started delivering a little less, because the standard clearly wasn't being held anyway.

Marcus was still liked. He'd stopped being respected. And the team's output had quietly dropped to match the lowest bar he was willing to enforce.

When an engagement survey came back with strong "approachability" scores and weak "confidence in leadership" scores, he finally saw the gap he'd built.

1. Saying the true thing before the comfortable thing

Respect is built in the moments you could have said something easier and didn't. Every time you choose comfort over honesty, you spend a small amount of the trust you're trying to build.

2. Applying standards evenly, even to people you like

The fastest way to lose respect is to hold a line for some people and quietly let others off it. People notice inconsistency faster than they notice almost anything else.